Expert comment from leading figures within the business community, on a variety of
topical issues across a range of sectors.
AUDIT: SHIFTING EXPECTATIONS
BY SIMON
NICHOLAS Partner
KPMG Audit LLC
EDWARD HOUGHTON
Director KPMG Audit LLC
Following well publicised business failures such as
BHS, Carillion and Patisserie Valerie there is a marked
shift in the public profile of audits, expectations
surrounding audit quality and the role auditors
play in the financial condition of businesses. It has
recently become clear that auditing standards and
the profession have not kept pace with the latest
expectation that society now has on the level of
assurance an audit should provide. Indeed in a
number of cases the Big 4 firms have sought to extend
the scope aspects of assurance but this has not been
universally accepted by the market. The words in
the audit opinion are not consistent with the public’s
understanding of an audit and as a result there has
been a significant erosion of trust in the profession,
our work and the assurance an audit opinion provides.
This trust must be restored and the work performed
as part of an audit has to evolve to greater meet the
needs of users of financial statements.
It is vital that the profession addresses whether an audit now
meets the needs of the users, is free from all perceived conflicts
and can be effectively supervised by a regulator.
‘THE EXPECTATION GAP’
Arguably auditing standards have not been enhanced enough
as a result of the issues seen during the financial crisis where
there was a gap between what the profession and the public, via
the media, thought an audit represented – in particular on the
forward looking aspects of an audit such as going concern. Going
concern as it currently stands relates to the ability and intent of
a company to continue trading in the near future – this is not
an opinion on the viability of a company’s business model and
financial statements do not address all of the risk factors that will
impact the future success of the company. Yet public sentiment
would suggest that an audit should address this area in order to
meet their needs.
Whilst the audit regulators and standard setters seek to address
the ‘expectation gap’, audit firms have been told to invest
significantly in areas where the profession faces scrutiny and for
audit to go deeper and further. This includes a need for auditors
to invest heavily in specialist resources and technology solutions
to enable the provision of greater assurance, for example through
advanced data analytics tools providing the ability to analyse
thousands of transactions to find the needle in the haystack and
understand unusual transactions.
In the past, the profession has relied on hiring the best graduates
and developing its people through world class training, primarily
in accountancy. However, there is now the expectation that audit
teams have such a depth of skills and technical expertise that
audit teams need to evolve from primarily comprising accountants
to increased use of deep specialists in tax, investment valuation,
property valuation, actuaries and IT and cyber on an audit. This is
in order to provide comfort that the key risks are fully understood
and the audit assurance provided is to a greater level of precision.
Whilst this does create additional work, if executed well there will
be benefits to clients as the specialists are in a unique position
to be able to deliver greater insight on peer benchmarking, best
practices and industry insights.
As a result locally we have continued to build our specialist
teams in these areas, not only to advise clients directly, but also
involving these specialists in the audits we complete to ensure
robust challenge and high quality conclusions. Inevitably all of this
translates into the increased cost of an audit, a trend which has
been observed in the UK for the past couple of years.
CONFLICTS The underlying principle of auditor independence has never
wavered, but the perception of conflicts of interest, how these are
identified, considered and safeguarded against has continued
to evolve. There is the clear desire to ensure that an audit, given
the trust and reliance placed on it by stakeholders, is seen
as truly independent. To ensure there is no perception that
independence is not at the heart of the audit, structural change
is being proposed in the UK to ensure that audits are in no
way linked to, or subsidised by, wider consulting relationships.
Any perceived threat to audit quality, independent challenge
of management and robust conclusions must be eradicated.
KPMG in the UK has been a first mover in this regard in ensuring
absolute clarity over independence by ceasing to provide
advisory services where they act as auditor on their largest
listed clients. It is possible that this may not be deemed to go
far enough with the current debate exploring the complete
separation of the management of audit practices.
REGULATORY EXPECTATIONS
The spectre of regulatory oversight looms large over the audit
sector, with increased frequency of reviews, time spent and
depth of challenge a matter of routine – not just where failure
has occurred. Regulator expectations of both management and
auditors has never been higher. There have been a number
of high profile instances of record sanctions in the UK for
management, businesses and auditors in recent years where
non-compliance has been identified. The need for the highest
levels of professional scepticism, independent challenge and
consideration of contradictory evidence throughout represents a
high hurdle. This is not to say that professional scepticism hasn’t
always been a key pillar that an audit is built on, but that pillar just
got wider and the depth of expected inspection deeper.
Following this increase in regulator supervision, audit firms have
been told to better document outright compliance with the
relevant standards and justify house interpretations of the rules.
The bar has been raised significantly, resulting in a transformation
of audit execution in order to comply and retain audit registrations.
Put simply, this environment is driving a step change for auditors
demanding a greater quality of assurance and an evolution of
audit techniques and the skillsets of those involved in the audit,
no matter what the cost. With audit fees in the UK already rising
in double digit percentages and various on-going reviews of the
audit market, the pace of change impacting the profession and its
clients shows no signs of slowing down.
| 9